Leave a comment

The Authenticity of “Rohingya Identity”

To begin this chapter let me start with the quotation of a famous historian. He (Moshe Yegar) writes;
“Today Arakanese Muslim calls themselves Rohingya or Roewengya. – – – writers and poets appeared  among the Arakanese Muslims, especially during fifteenth to eighteenth centuries; and there were even some Muslim court poets at the courts of Arakan king’s. (see in chapter four). These poets and writers wrote in Persian and Arabic or in the mixed Language, Rohingya, which they developed among themselves and which was a mixture of Arabia, Bengali, Urdu, and Arakanese. This language is not as widespread today as it was in the past and it has been largely replacedby Burmese and Arakanese. The Muslim artists then also developed the art of calligraphy. Some manuscripts have been preserved but have not yet been scientifically examined. – – – The Muslims who came to Arakan brought with them Arab, Indian, and especially Bengali music and musical instruments. Persian song is sung by Arakanese Muslims to this day. That is how the Rohingyas preserved their own heritage from the impact of the Buddhist environment not only as far as their religion is concerned but also in some aspects of their culture.”
As human society developed, identity and ethnicity developed too. Identity is not static, but dynamic. In course of time many new identity of ethnicities grew up. Some even changed their ethnic names which we can observe in our country’s demography. Rohingya identity developed through the interaction of historical processes. It is the product of history, not novel identities forged by a group as being portrayed by some biased historians. No historian can say Rohingya speak Bengali, but just a type of Bengali just like Rakhine is a type of Burma language. Cultural affinity alone cannot tie together two geographically separate ethnic people. Political, geo-graphical and economic life of people is main factures that lead to separate identity. Many Myanmar ethnic peoples changed their ethnic names in course of times. We witnessed it in the census records of early this year.
In the last chapters we can see Muslims and their cultural influence in Arakan to a large extent. Mostly they are referred as Muslims. Muslim is not a race or an ethnic people. So to fill the need of time, this Muslims lately began to be called as Rohingya.
In his famous book “Burma in revolt: opium and insurgency since 1948”, Bertil litner described the Muslims of Rakhine as another hybrid race which much later was to become known as Rohingya”
One well known historian is trying to identify Rohingya as Bengali by pointing out that British time Bengali infiltration was not only in Rakhine but also in Myanmar side; and there are Bengali Mosques in Yangon. What we must realize is Rohingyas, despite their some affinity with some aspect of Bengali, they were in Arakan before British time. They are not British time immigrants. Their Mosques, one in Aung San Football stadium compound and another in Piniegong ward, Yangon were built before British time and are known as Rakhine Bali(Mosques) These mosques were rewarded by king Bagyi daw to his Arakan Muslims diehard army unit,[See: Encyclopedia Britinica, 2003]
Myanmar specialist Matin smith in his “Insurgency: the politics of ethnicity”, 1995, said; Rohingya had become increasingly popular in recent years.
To those writers who want to relate Rohingya’s root toBengali and who want to say Rohingya is not an ethnic name but a geographic locator, I would like to ask where the ethnic root of all Myanmar people come. Almost all Myanmar people have their origin somewhere out of the country.
Professor David Stein Berg presents; the people that call themselves Rohingya, as an unrecognized cultural minority that has emerged in a space with “traditionally undefined frontiers” and heavily Muslims and culturally related population.[Slein Berg; “Burma, what everyone need to know, Oxford, 2010”, P.22]
Egreteam and Jagan explained that the term Rohingya is the name under which the local population had been known since 1950. (Egreteam and Jagan, soldiers and diplomacy in Burma; P.132)
Jaeques p.leider, the renowned supporter of Rakhine version of Rakhine history writes:
“Francis Hamilton is one of the most qualified persons to have knowledge on Rakhine related issues in that time.What we learned from him on the one hand that there was a Muslim community in Rakhine at the moment of the conquest in 1784 and on the other hand that both Hindus and Muslims were among those hundreds or thousands of Rakhines who had been deported and resettled in upper Myanmar. These Muslims spoke an Indian language of their own in which they call themselves Rooinga to state the place where they are from. – – – As many Muslims from Rakhine had also fled the kingdom into Bengal around the time Hamilton visited the areas, there is at leasta great likely hood that Hamilton could have heard the name “Rooingo” from them.[J. Leider; Rohingya the name , the movement 2014, P-10] Again Leider says: there is absolutely no doubt about the existence of urban and rural Muslim communities who were living inside the kingdom that became part of Myanmar in 1785.
The most authentic evidence is the report of an advisory commission on the issue of promoting Arakan into a state.That commission was formed on 29, April 1960, by the office of prime minister. It composed of most senior veteran independence activists and the highest ranking official post holders. They are:
Dr.Ba U, ex. union president —      as Chairman
Dr. U Thein Maung ex. Judicial minister –     Member
U Tin ex.  speaker of Pyithu Luttaw –      Member
U Ohn Phe   ex. Chief Justice –         Member
U Chit Thaung   ex. Minister –     Member
In above commission report on 30th December 1960, It is said Rohingya from Mayu district also object to the notion of Rakhine state hood. Thus this commission recognized Rohingya ( See 1958- 62 Myanmar politics vol. III by U Kyaw Win +3, who were appointed to write true history of Myanmar by SLORC 1991, P-230)“
After the British occupation of Rakhine in 1825 and the Yandapo treaty of 1826, many, if not most people from Rakhine who had taken refuge in the district of Chitt’agong returned to Rakhine. [J. Leider 20-14] Refugees were of  both Muslims and Rakhine. Rakhine were said to be returnees. Many regard Muslim returnees as immigrants.
When thousands of people fled Rakhine (Arakan) in late eighteenth century under the pressure of Myanmar troops who brutally requisitioned Rakhine rice stocks for king Bodawphaya’s naval expeditions against Siam. There were also Muslims . There is no reason not to assume that many of them returned to Rakhine as well though we unfortunately know nothing in detail. ( Dr .J. Leider , Rohingya the name, the identity; 2014, P.20)
Abdul Mabood khan says that people from the district of Chittagong even today use that term Rohingya to mean the Arakanese Muslim. (The Maghs Buddhist community in Bengla Desh. P-44)
J. Leider further writes:
Islamic cultural influence on the Rakhine court came first from the sultanate of Bengal in the 15th century as shown by minting of coins during Mrauk-U’s golden age in the 17th century. Chittagong was an economic pillar of the kingdom and Muslims formed a large part of the king’s subjects and Muslim traders competed with Portuguese and Dutch traders. [Here in 17th century Chittagong fell into the hand of Mughal. The large Muslim subjects mentioned above, therefore, must be Muslim in Rakhine proper.] When Bengal fell into the hands of Mughal in 1567, soldiers who fought against the Mughal apparently took service at the court of Rakhine. (J. Leider 2014, P.10)
These soldiers were mostly Afghans. Their presence in Rakhine society had a deep impact to change the social structure of native Muslims: the Rohingyas.
Dr.J. Leider who again mentioned, “There is absolutely no doupt about the existence of urban and rural Muslim communities who were living inside the kingdom that become part of Myanmar in 1785. [J. Leider the name, the movement 2014, P.10] The agony of fateis, still Rakhine politicians blindly say “today’s Muslims in Rakhine are all illegal immigrants. They all should be subject to verification and naturalization”. He further emphasized “a literate Muslim community also existed in Mrauk-U”.
Where this Muslim gone? They were there for many centuries. Many generations passed. Still can you say there is no social, cultural change among them? In fact they evolved into a distinct community. Their root is not from the captives deported by Arakan fleet in sixteen to eighteenth centuries as highlighted by Dr.J.P. Leider. There were a large Muslim settlement before that which we can trace in Dr. Leider’s other articles related to Arakan history.
We can say this distinctive community was there even before Mrauk-U period. Here Maurice Collis in collaboration with San Shwe Bu an Arakanese wrote, “Arakan being adjacent to Bengal their might have been a considerable number of Muslim population in it before Mrauk-U age. [This Muslim’s ethnic name today is Rohingya.] (Journal of Burma research society Vol.15, 1925, P.33)
There was a big Muslim community part of which was deported by Bodow Phaya’s army to Amarapura. Some of the king Bodaw Phaya’s political measures taken after the conquest of Rakhine hint at the long established presence of dignitaries and officials hailing from Bengal at the court of Rakhine Kings. — The Rakhine punnas (court-brahmins and ceremonial specialists) who came all from Bengal were collectively deported to Amerapura and became a new elite at the Kangbaung court. The king appointed Abhishah Husseine, the head of Arakan Muslims as the head of all the Muslims of Myanmar. (see ThanTun, the royal order of Burma, Kyoto centre for South East Asian study 1983-90, Vol 6, also J.leider, Rohingya the name – – – 2014, P.12)
J.leider writes:
“Beyond the peculiar insight into cultural brokers hip of both local Muslim teachers and Buddhist monks, who translated the ( Persian) manuscripts also, throw light on the intellelual network of Muslim that testify to a shared Muslim culture and identity that spanned the north east coast of the Bay of Bengal until the colonial period. – – – British interacted with the population through local Muslim interpreters in the early colonial time and obtained historical information in the country through local Muslims.(J. Leider, 2014, p.11)
University distance education first year  current  geography text bock contains, “ In the northern Rakhine state close to the border with Bangla Desh at Buthidaung and Maung Daw townships are where the Rohingya and Shittogonians tive; These minority ethnic groups had settled in the border regions Since early days” [Yangon University of distance education, first year, textbook, Geography of Myanmar, Module No. Geo 1004, code No. 14.B, P-61].
In post independence period – we have a lot of official record testifying Rohingya’s identity. First Myanmar newspaper, Encyclopaedia, journals, periodicals including the one issued by the defence ministry had wide publicity of Rohingya’s indigenous status. The most remarkable one is U Aung Gyi, Union National Democracy part chairman’s explanation in party news bulletin February 1992, where he said “it was me who solved the Rohingya problem. It is Myanmar cabinet that had decided to name former Rakhine Muslims as Rohingya.”
Secondly there were registrations of university Rohingya student organization, Rohingya daily newspaper, Rohingya labor union.
Thirdly 1961 September 15 Myanmar cabinet had decided to relay four additional ethnic broadcasting program from Burma broadcasting service. Those were Rohingya, Pa-Oo, Lah-ho and Mon languages (see BBS 30th Anniversary Publication journal by U Kyaw Nyint P.71)
Fourthly Muslims in north Arakan, were issued family registration cards with Rohingya as their race. Returnees from B.D refugee camps registration cards also bear the same identity. Most interesting is in the latest NaSaKa yearly verification endorsements on family registration card also recognised Rohingya’s identity. [See. Copies in the appendices]
Again our birth certificates, departmental service identity cards including defence ministry’s bear the name Rohingya. Some are attached here as documents. (See at the end in the appendices).Can we still say there is no evidences of the term Rohingya in Myanmar history as some Rohingya opponents are trying to say.
Here the statement of special Rapporteur Ms. Yang Hee Lee on the Human Rights situation in Myanmar on 26, July 2014 at Yangon international air port is one of the inducive documents for Rohingya’s identity issue. What the special rapporteur ‘Yang Hi Lee’ say were:
Issues around terminology and citizenship are particularly sensitive. I was repeatedly told not to use the term Rohingya” as this was not recognized by the Government. Yet as a Human Rights independent expert, I am guided by international Human Rights law. In this regard, the rights of minorities to self-identify on the basis of their of national, ethnic, religions and linguistic Characteristics is related to the obligation of states to ensure nondiscrimination against individuals and groups, which is central principle of international Human rights Law. I also note that various Human rights bodies and, inter-governmental bodies, including the committee on the rights of the child which I chaired for four years,and of which I was a member for ten years. The Human Rights council and the general assembly use the term ‘Rohingya’. (Burma Focus IIX) 
During the 25th ASEAN submit on 12th November 2014, in Nay Pyitaw, UN secretary general Ban Ki Moon called on Myanmar government to recongnize Rohingya and give them full and equal citizenship. He said the world includeing all UN organs know them as Rohingya. So I should call them Rphingya too.
Yet to the agony of our fate; some ignorant, unkownledgeable, extremely biased people once used to say “the term Rohingya is a baseless fabrication. It is found in no history records”. Whence piles of history records are brought to the light, the same biased group above came out to say “Rohingyais a reference Bangali used to refer Rakhine. But the research of Dr.Francis Hamilton Bhcanan made in Bangala- Myanmar border clearly described and comparatively analysed Rohingya and Rakhine as two different Languages. And today, the research of ISO says Rohingya language is unique in the world. It is similar to none. It has given a distinct code number for Rohingya language.

Note : For detailed Etymology of  ‘Rohingya’ we can see at Abu Aaneen (a) U Kyaw Min’s “Towards understanding Arakan (Rakhine) History”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: